home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- <text id=92TT2351>
- <title>
- Oct. 19, 1992: Deciphering a Racist Business Code
- </title>
- <history>
- TIME--The Weekly Newsmagazine--1992
- Oct. 19, 1992 The Homestretch: Clinton in Control
- </history>
- <article>
- <source>Time Magazine</source>
- <hdr>
- THE WEEK, Page 21
- BUSINESS
- Deciphering a Racist Business Code
- </hdr><body>
- <p>A California employment agency is caught illegally
- discriminating
- </p>
- <p> In the bad old days, a company looking to fill a job
- selectively would call an employment agency and simply say,
- "Don't send me any blacks." That kind of discrimination is
- illegal now, but some companies still find ways of using code
- words to avoid job applicants on the basis of race, sex and
- age. The Equal Employment Opportunity Commission caught
- Interplace, a Los Angeles employment agency, in the act. In the
- largest such suit to be settled, Interplace has agreed to pay
- $2 million for using a complex set of signals to screen out
- workers for its clients. Some 3,900 victims of the scheme will
- share the compensation.
- </p>
- <p> The agency used simple phrases to make sure its clients
- could discriminate at will. If a firm wanted only Japanese
- workers, for example, it would instruct Interplace to have
- applicants "talk to Ma riko." Other codes blocked blacks,
- Hispanics, men or women for certain work. The practice is
- disturbingly widespread. The EEOC is now pursuing actions
- against employment agencies in other states that use similar
- codes. Some go so far as to specify "no accents," meaning no
- minorities of any kind. Companies receiving this special service
- include Wall Street firms, insurance companies, manufacturers
- and at least one magazine publisher.
- </p>
-
- </body></article>
- </text>
-
-